Automation, Integration, Simulation: A Guide to Game-Changing CAD/CAM Trends

Automation, Integration, Simulation: A Guide to Game-Changing CAD/CAM Trends

Photo credits: Laser cutting at our client Ferrier (39), a specialist in fine sheet metal work, Stéphane Couchet ©

Shorter lead times, smaller production runs, more complex geometries, and a shortage of technical talent: mechanical workshops are facing an unprecedented accumulation of pressures. In this context, CAD and CAM software are no longer merely design or programming tools. They have become central to the operational performance of industrial companies.

But the sheer number of digital innovations makes it difficult to prioritize. AI, digital twins, additive manufacturing, integrated ERP—where to start… and why? To help clarify things, we spoke with the experts at TOPSOLID. Benoît Lallier, a specialist in CAD/CAM environments, and Alexis Jacquillard, an ERP integration expert, share their take on the major trends for 2026—all without beating around the bush, using concrete examples.

Automation: Say Goodbye to Manual Programming

The first major trend is the automation of repetitive tasks, both in design and machining. AI in the strict sense isn’t yet being used for CAM (with the timeline for the most advanced machining functions being around 2027–2028), but structured and pragmatic automation, available today.

On the CAD front: building on what we’ve already achieved

How much time do we waste redesigning components that we’ve modeled dozens of times? Benoît Lallier identifies this as one of the first levers to activate: the libraries of parameterized components. “If I have a catalog of cylinders from a supplier like Festo and, as a design firm, I need to use them regularly, rather than redesigning the cylinder each time, I add it to my library. Or I import the 3D file directly from the supplier’s website.”

>>>> See also – From the Design Office to the Workshop: How Can We Break Down Silos to Improve Production?

TopSolid also includes smart components that automate the CAD operations related to their placement. “When you place a screw to assemble two parts, it automatically creates the drill hole in the first part and the tapped hole in the second. On a full project, this saves dozens of minutes.”

To take things a step further, you can save generic workflows and operational scripts that can be reapplied to new geometry with just a few clicks, or develop custom automations using TopSolid’s APIs—for companies willing to invest a little time in development.

CAM: From the Tool Library to Boost Milling

The same principle of capitalization applies to machining. The cutting tool libraries centralize the parameters for each tool, whether you build your own database or import them directly from suppliers (Kennametal, Sandvik, Fraisa, etc.) via the ISO 13399 standard. “Some customers assign a dedicated person to create these libraries. The effort is made up front, and then the entire shop benefits from it.”

Once these foundations are in place, the benefits accelerate. A CNC program can be automatically reapplied to new geometry: If the part changes, the machining path is recalculated without starting from scratch, using associative mode. You can also duplicate an entire machining sequence from one part to another that is very similar. “It’s really just copy and paste. All you have to do is copy the relevant faces.”

Among the still underutilized strategies, Benoît Lallier cites Boost Milling (trochoidal machining). “It’s like going from a BMW to a Formula 1 car. You can save up to 70% of roughing time compared to a standard strategy. The main obstacle is often a lack of knowledge: customers who aren’t familiar with the technology don’t buy the right cutting tools. Those who give it a try never go back.”

Automated Manufacturing Files round out the picture. Instead of relying on verbal communication between the programmer and the operator, TopSolid automatically generates a structured document that includes processing times per operation, tool references, tolerances, and 2D drawings. “The operator arrives with a detailed list. Every time he turns a page, he knows exactly what to do. It’s very instructive.”

An Often-Overlooked Issue: The Transfer of Know-How

When an FAO expert retires, their years of experience go with them—unless they have been documented in libraries and recorded procedures.

That’s exactly what TopSolid makes possible. “New employees can reuse what their colleagues have developed, without having to become super-experts themselves.”

>>>>See also – Training Tomorrow’s Technicians Using Today’s Tools

From Silo to Digital Thread: CAD/CAM/ERP Integration as a Competitive Advantage

This is the most transformative trend of 2026—and one of the most underrated. In many workshops, CAD, CAM, and ERP still operate as three parallel systems that don’t really communicate with one another. The consequences are well known, but are often accepted as inevitable.

The Pain of Compartmentalization

Alexis Jacquillard sums it up clearly: “The ERP is the nerve center of a company. That’s where everything flows through. When you have independent databases that don’t use the same reference framework, you don’t know if a reference in one system corresponds to the same reference in the other. We may all be talking, but we’re not speaking the same language.”

Visible costs (re-entry, file conversions, duplicates) are just the tip of the iceberg. Silent errors are often more serious: a discrepancy between the design department’s model and what is actually manufactured, material requirements calculated based on an obsolete bill of materials, or information lost when transferring data from one system to another.

In large organizations, the role of “data manager” is emerging to ensure the consistency of databases. This is a real problem, and it comes at a cost.

What Integration Actually Changes

When the supply chain is based on a single data model, the benefits are measurable within the first few weeks. “Take the case of a manufacturer of specialized machinery. The sales representative takes an order, and the draftsman designs the machine. The production planning department doesn’t have to re-enter everything—it benefits directly from the draftsman’s work. From the design department to the production planning department, we easily save 50% of the time. And there are no data entry errors.”

The connection between FAO and ERP opens up a particularly powerful angle of analysis: the comparison between theoretical time and actual time. The machining time calculated by the CAM system serves as the baseline. Once production begins, the ERP system records the actual time logged by the operator. “If the CAM system consistently estimates three minutes but we’re systematically taking four, we need to figure out why. That shows us where there’s waste in the production process that we could address.”

The integration now covers the entire TOPSOLID ecosystem: CAD, TopSolid’Cam (machining), TopSolid’Cut (sheet metal fabrication), ShopFloor (shop floor management), PartCosting, and Inspection. These modules are natively connected to the ERP system: ShopFloor transmits purchase requirements to the ERP system, which then issues purchase orders and reports the quantities received.

Next step: a stronger integration with Inspection, allowing users to open TopSolid’Inspection directly from the ERP system and scan their drawings; the dimensions to be measured will then be automatically imported into the ERP system.

The “best-of-breed” argument: a direct response

Some industry leaders argue that putting together the best specialized components on the market is superior to an integrated suite. Alexis Jacquillard responds bluntly: “Sure, they can choose the best tools on the market. But they won’t be as well integrated as what we’re doing today. The integration is robust because it’s an internal standard, not a custom development. When customers request updates, we incorporate them, and everyone benefits. With a best-of-breed approach, it’s often a costly custom solution that will need to be refinanced with every new request.”

Added to this is a fundamental argument that current hiring challenges make more relevant than ever: “In the past, executives would say to themselves, ‘It’s no big deal—I’ll just hire someone to re-enter the data.’ Today, hiring at every level is difficult. These interconnections are simply tools that make the process easier. We’ve reached the point where it’s hard to understand why a system isn’t automated.”

Change management: the real obstacle

The main barrier to adopting an integrated system is not technical. It is human. “Changing ERP systems is like changing the way a company is managed. It’s natural to be afraid of that. But an ERP system has a lifespan of between 7 and 10 years. The real question is what we stand to lose by sticking with an outdated system.”

TOPSOLID supports this transition with training, workshops, and skills transfer, with timeframes ranging from three months for a direct production launch to six months for full migrations. These periods also often provide an opportunity to revamping data and processes: “We’re taking advantage of this change to get everything in order. Clients are realizing that their database needed a major cleanup.”

>>>See also See also – Producing Quickly and Well: Industrial SMEs Face the Challenge of Customer Deadlines

Digital Twins and Simulation: From Buzzword to On-the-Shop-Floor Reality

The term “digital twin” has become so overused that it deserves to be grounded in reality. In a machine shop, a digital twin is, above all, a faithful 3D representation of the machine tool, its immediate surroundings, and the parts being machined on it, with sufficient accuracy to ensure that the remote simulation is reliable.

Benoît Lallier explains: “The goal is to have a virtual 3D model of your machine tool so you can perform the most realistic simulation possible. That way, when I’m programming from my desk—without being at the machine—I can already know what the machine is going to do.”

Integrated simulation makes it possible to verify in advance that there are no collisions, to determine the precise cycle times used for costing and sales, to analyze material flows for a given production run, and to balance workloads across machines before the parts go into production. “At some point, the customer thinks to himself: ‘Hey, instead of running this part through the small machine, it would be better to use the one next to it.’ It seems obvious, but in a just-in-time system, it’s not always that simple.”

There are two concrete benefits. In the workshop, the focus time plummets: The operator arrives with a manufacturing specification that lists exactly which tools are to be assembled, along with their dimensions and settings. Outside the workshop, the machine can continue to produce while the programmer prepares the next program—background programming.

Simulation also protects equipment. We’re talking about machines worth hundreds of thousands of euros, cutting tools whose breakage results in immediate costs, and parts made of expensive materials that would end up as scrap in the event of an error. “The goal is to avoid breaking anything. We can quickly detect whether a path will cause a collision before the actual machine is even touched.”

The Post-Processor as the Cornerstone

It is this feature that converts the simulated paths into machine code recognized by the CNC system, without the need for manual corrections. “This is a capability TOPSOLID has honed over more than 40 years. The idea is to deliver a turnkey solution: the customer clicks ‘Send Code’ and doesn’t have to do anything else.”

Additive Manufacturing, 5-Axis Machining, and Hybrid Processes

5-axis machining is becoming more widespread, and with it, the complexity of production runs and strategies. Hybrid machines, capable of alternating between additive and subtractive manufacturing, open up possibilities for geometries that were previously unattainable, while reducing the number of workpiece setups.

These developments do not call into question the previous principles: having a CAD/CAM solution capable of managing these advanced processes without any breaks in the digital chain remain essential for effective implementation. A 5-axis route generated in a tool that is not integrated with the ERP system does not allow you to leverage actual data or fine-tune the associated costs.

TOPSOLID has also integrated robotics in its environment, treating the robot like a conventional machine tool. “We didn’t want to make a distinction,” explains Benoît Lallier. “A customer who programs parts on their machining centers should be able to switch to the robot without having to relearn anything. Aside from the specific configuration settings related to the rotational axes, the logic is the same.”

Collaboration and Skill Development: People Remain at the Center

All of the trends mentioned above have one thing in common: they only achieve their full potential if the teams using them are trained, supported, and able to collectively build on their practices.

So the issue isn’t just about choosing the right tools, but about choosing a software provider capable of providing long-term support: during initial deployment, when upgrading to new versions, and whenever a new business need arises. Furthermore, the new generations of technicians trained on TopSolid represent a tangible asset for companies looking to hire. “The same logic applies everywhere. When they join a company, there’s no learning curve.”

How can we turn these trends into a competitive advantage?

The point isn’t to chase after every innovation at once. It’s to clarify its own challenges (timelines, quality, flexibility, cost control) and map out its current digital chain. Where are the gaps? Where are we losing time, information, and profit margins?

The levers often become apparent on their own: CAD/CAM integration if programming is a bottleneck; connection to the ERP system if re-entering data and variances between theoretical and actual costs are costly; and simulation if fine-tuning on the shop floor takes a long time and scrap is frequent. In each of these cases, The effectiveness of these tools depends directly on the consistency of the digital chain that connects them.

That is precisely where the strength of an integrated suite like TOPSOLID lies: not in being the best component in each segment, but in having all the components work together seamlessly within a common reference framework.

Would you like to assess which automation or integration solutions are best suited for your workshop? Contact our teams for a detailed discussion about your specific situation.

Production Data: Why Industrial SMEs Need to Break Their Reliance on Excel

Production Data: Why Industrial SMEs Need to Break Their Reliance on Excel

Photo credit: MSK (51), a metalwork specialist that designs and manufactures custom staircases, gates, and glass canopies, Stéphane Couchet ©

Excel remains the preferred management tool in many industrial SMEs. Versatile and familiar to everyone, it seems to meet all needs. However, behind this apparent simplicity lie major risks to competitiveness and compliance. Between data entry errors, multiple versions, and a lack of real-time traceability, spreadsheets are showing their limitations when it comes to meeting today’s market demands. It’s time to explore alternatives tailored to the realities of SMEs.

Excel: The Indispensable Swiss Army Knife for Industrial SMEs

Used in most industrial small and medium-sized enterprises, Excel is mastered by all generations of shop floor supervisors and operators. It is recognized for its remarkable versatility, as it allows users to manage quotes, calculate costs, plan machine utilization, track production orders (POs), analyze overall equipment effectiveness (OEE), and even create dashboards. All of this can be done without any additional investment, since the tool is included in the Office suite, which is often purchased for all administrative and sales tasks.

When Flexibility Becomes a Trap

However, despite its widespread use at all levels of the workshop (from operators to managers), Excel also has its limitations. Among the challenges frequently encountered are broken formulas, broken links between files, and data accidentally overwritten—and this list is by no means exhaustive. Add to this the proliferation of versions, which can cause conflicts in document management and, by extension, in the production chain.

The consequences are numerous and costly:

  • time spent on manual consolidation and cross-checks,
  • decisions based on outdated data,
  • the growing complexity of the process for welcoming newcomers, who struggle to navigate the multitude of files and data recorded in an increasingly fragile system.

Audits and Traceability: When Excel Puts Your Certifications at Risk

While Excel has been widely adopted and has proven its worth on the shop floor, it also appears to have reached the end of its useful life and is no longer suited to the industry’s requirements. Traceability standards are indeed becoming increasingly stringent, yet it remains impossible to guarantee data integrity with Excel.

One thing leading to another, customer relations are also compromised due to longer response times when complaints are filed.

The result: companies risk losing their certifications, being excluded from bids, and facing contractual penalties. It’s a tricky combination with serious financial repercussions.

>>> See also – Industrial Traceability: How Can You Improve the Quality of Your Products and Processes?

Technical and Financial Risks of Excel

Aside from potential data entry errors, the data entered into Excel actually comes from design and manufacturing systems: CAD drawings, bills of materials, and production work orders. This manual re-entry breaks the digital continuity and creates a dangerous gap between design and production.

In this scenario, it is possible that the design department might make a change to dimensions or materials that is not reflected in the workshop’s Excel files. This discrepancy would result in production being launched based on outdated information and lead to nonconformities, whereas TopSolid automatically updates bills of materials and work instructions.

Similarly, specifying a new material requires a manual recalculation of machining times and costs. In Excel, simply omitting a single cell can cause the quote to be truncated. However, with TopSolid, the recalculation is automatic thanks to the material libraries.

Migrating Without Turning Everything Upside Down: A Gradual and Controlled Transition

Given these findings, the temptation to maintain the status quo remains strong. Transitioning to a new system is daunting: it requires a significant investment, faces resistance to change, and carries the risk of disrupting production during the transition… However, a methodical and gradual approach makes it possible to ensure a successful digital transformation without disrupting the workshop’s operations.

The first step is to identify the critical processes that need to be secured as a priority. Work orders, bills of materials, and production schedules are generally the top three priorities. Once these foundational data sets are reliably stored in a centralized system, they eliminate a large portion of the risks mentioned earlier. Rather than undertaking a radical digitization effort, it is therefore better to start with a limited scope (a pilot workshop, a production line) and then expand gradually.

When it comes to choosing a tool, small and medium-sized businesses often assume they need a complex and expensive ERP system to take the plunge. However, digital continuity solutions such as CAD, CAM, PDM, and ERP—like TopSolid—offer a logical alternative: they secure and automate data updates throughout the entire data lifecycle. This eliminates the need to re-enter information from CAD models into Excel.

The benefits become apparent quickly: a drastic reduction in data entry errors, the time spent searching for information cut by two or three, and renewed confidence in shared data.

However, change management remains crucial. Teams need to be trained, involved in setting up the new tools, and see their initial successes recognized in order to better embrace this change.

Finally, such a change is not intended to eliminate Excel from the landscape. Rather, it is about restoring Excel to its proper role: that of a tool for ad hoc analysis and simulation, rather than a mission-critical management system.

>>> See also – CFAO: 3 Reasons Not to Neglect Customer Service and Training When Choosing a Solution

From Theory to Practice: A Successful Transformation in 6 Months

Several success stories illustrate how such a transition can be successfully managed. Generally speaking, the starting point is the same: dozens of Excel files deemed critical, several hours spent each day manually consolidating data, and recurring errors despite procedures that are considered well-designed.

The turning point came during a major client audit, when it proved impossible to quickly retrieve the complete history of a defective batch because the data was scattered across several spreadsheets… whose versions were unclear.

Management then initiates a structured process, which involves mapping information flows, identifying truly sensitive data, and analyzing available solutions. This is where TopSolid stands out, with its ability to natively integrate CAD, CAM, and document management into a unified environment. The strength of this approach lies in restoring digital continuity from design to production.

What about the migration? It’s a gradual process: first the engineering department, then the teams in charge of the processes, and finally the shop floor operators.

Results are visible as early as 6 months after the solution is deployed.

  • No more version errors in the drawings, as every change is tracked and approved in the system.
  • The traceability of work orders is now comprehensive, from launch to delivery.
  • Response times to customer requests are significantly reduced thanks to the centralization and accessibility of information.
  • The next audit is streamlined thanks to optimal document management.

Beyond the numerical metrics and the commercial and financial impacts, it is the cultural transformation that stands out. Teams are more open to collaboration thanks to a single, reliable database. In addition, skill development is accelerated and valued through operators’ direct access to 3D models and up-to-date product lines. The challenge is no longer to search for the right information but to leverage the full wealth of available data with just a few clicks to get the most out of it.

As data becomes increasingly strategic in the industry, securing it is no longer an option but a necessity for remaining competitive. The question is no longer whether to move beyond Excel, but when and how to do so intelligently. Industrial SMEs that take the plunge with a tailored solution like TopSolid quickly discover that they do not lose flexibility. On the contrary, they gain in reliability, peace of mind, and competitiveness.

From the Design Office to the Workshop: How Can We Break Down Silos to Improve Production?

From the Design Office to the Workshop: How Can We Break Down Silos to Improve Production?

In the manufacturing industry, the separation between the design department and the production floor remains a persistent reality. This organizational structure, in which each department operates in isolation, leads to inefficiencies that can be costly for both sides. Production delays, nonconformities, multiple reworks… The consequences of this compartmentalization directly impact companies’ competitiveness.

Given today’s demands for responsiveness, efficiency, and quality, rethinking the collaboration between design and manufacturing has become a strategic imperative. How can we identify the bottlenecks? What measures can we take to streamline communication? This organizational transformation presents a major challenge for technical managers, while also offering an opportunity for substantial gains. Details.

When Organizational Silos Affect Industrial Performance

The compartmentalization characteristic of many industrial companies offers undeniable advantages, such as specialized skills and a clear division of responsibilities. However, this structure can sometimes hinder the flow of information between teams—despite their best intentions—and lead to friction:

  • technical misunderstandings,
  • delays in submitting requests for significant changes,
  • longer production lead times,
  • an increase in correspondence (albeit necessary) to clarify certain technical points,
  • Extension of the deadlines for all stakeholders to incorporate and validate the adjustments.

Quality can also be affected—not due to a lack of professionalism, but because of legitimate differences in interpretation. A theoretically optimal tolerance may prove difficult to maintain with the available equipment, without anyone being truly responsible for it. However, while the necessary adjustments are part of the improvement process, they would benefit from being anticipated. And for good reason: their economic impact is real, and for any industrial company, regardless of its size, they represent an opportunity for significant improvement in overall productivity.

These costly communication breakdowns

Let’s take the classic example of a modification quickly implemented by the engineering department to address an urgent request. The design team, focused on customer satisfaction, approves the technical change (after carrying out the necessary checks, of course). Meanwhile, the production department strictly follows the procedures already in place, starting production based on the latest available information.

Since the two parties did not have the same level of information, each acted according to its own business logic. To avoid this situation, the solution would be to implement an automatic notification system.

Another common scenario: The design office sets ambitious technical specifications to meet the requirements of the project specifications. The production department, which learns of these specifications at the time of production, identifies practical constraints that were not anticipated. This is a simple illustration of the breadth and complementarity of expertise, highlighting the need for dialogue between departments to enhance the design with insights from the field.

Document management also presents a common challenge. While technical information naturally grows over time (through operator annotations, optimizations discovered during production, adjustments validated through use, etc.), the process of capitalizing on this know-how needs to be structured so that it benefits everyone at all levels. A centralized document management system could transform this individual knowledge into a collective asset.

These situations, which most industrial SMEs experience, should not be viewed as failures but as opportunities for optimization. Each identified case becomes a catalyst for improvement, helping to strengthen collaboration and overall performance.

Building Digital Continuity Between Design and Manufacturing

Digital continuity is transforming collaboration across departments. The concept: a shared work environment where information flows naturally, without interruptions or the need to re-enter data.

At the heart of this approach, the single 3D model serves as a common reference for all departments. No more uncertainty about which version is correct, and no more error-prone manual updates. Every change is automatically propagated throughout the entire documentation chain: drawings, bills of materials, work instructions, and more. This synchronization ensures that everyone is working with the same up-to-date data.

Traceability becomes complete and transparent. Who changed what, when, and why? The complete history remains accessible to everyone, making it easier to understand technical decisions and holding each stakeholder accountable. If a problem arises, the source can be identified immediately.

Furthermore, incorporating field constraints right from the design phase is a game-changer.

  • Designers review actual machine capabilities and available tooling.
  • Operators access the 3D models and understand the design intent.
  • Simulations confirm feasibility even before prototyping begins.

This collaborative approach intelligently combines conceptual creativity with on-the-ground realities.

Of course, this digital transformation comes with an essential human element. Training design office teams on shop floor constraints, teaching operators how to read 3D models, organizing cross-functional sessions… These investments gradually foster a shared culture in which each department understands and respects the constraints of the others.

>>> See also – How Are Collaborative Design and Digital Engineering Revolutionizing the Work of Engineering Firms?

Best Practices for Successful Collaboration Between the Design Office and the Workshop

Involving operators early in the project process changes the dynamic: rather than discovering manufacturing constraints at the launch stage, their hands-on expertise enriches the design from the very first drafts. In practical terms, during a project review for a complex part, an operator might suggest a minor modification that could cut machining time in half while maintaining the quality of the finished product. This prevents last-minute adjustments, and often underutilized expertise is brought to the forefront.

However, this collaboration requires structured points of contact:

  • weekly technical meetings,
  • process classification,
  • clear assignment of responsibilities (approval of minor changes, sharing of information, etc.),
  • documenting the expertise and best practices resulting from each project (lessons-learned reports, installation tips, technical solutions, etc.).

>>> See also – Configuration Management: Design Firms, Discover How TopSolid Improves Your Efficiency and Accuracy

Optimized collaboration between the engineering department and the shop floor represents a tremendous opportunity for progress for industrial companies. Far from calling into question anyone’s skills, this evolution enhances and amplifies expertise by facilitating synergy between them.

To support this smooth transition, solutions such as TopSolid are available. With its integrated approach (CAD, CAM, PDM) on a single platform, the tool offers a naturally collaborative environment and establishes digital continuity that facilitates communication without disrupting existing work methods. As a result, each department retains its unique characteristics while benefiting from a shared vision and common tools.

What if this gradual evolution paved the way for sustainable performance for your design office and workshop network? Contact our team to request a demo.

Predictive Maintenance: Revolutionizing Industrial Asset Management

Predictive Maintenance: Revolutionizing Industrial Asset Management

Maximizing the value and service life of equipment and infrastructure, improving operational performance, reducing costs and risks… These are just some of the many challenges involved in industrial asset management. To ensure an effective and optimized strategy, predictive maintenance relies on advanced technologies. The goal: to anticipate equipment failures. Let’s take a closer look.

Predictive Maintenance: An Intuitive Practice in Industry

What are the 5 types of maintenance in industry?

There are various types of industrial maintenance, which are carried out at different stages within industrial operations.

  • Corrective maintenance involves taking action after a breakdown to repair or replace the defective part or parts.
  • Preventive maintenance involves regular maintenance tasks performed according to a schedule or production cycles in order to prevent breakdowns.
  • Condition-based maintenance is based on monitoring the actual condition of equipment and is performed when certain thresholds are exceeded.
  • Predictive maintenance relies on advanced data analysis to anticipate breakdowns and take proactive measures to prevent them from occurring.
  • Proactive maintenance aims to identify and eliminate the root causes of failures. It also helps improve the long-term reliability of your equipment.

What is the difference between predictive and preventive maintenance?

Although often confused, predictive maintenance and preventive maintenance are two distinct aspects of industrial maintenance. The former relies on real-time data and advanced analytics to prevent breakdowns by anticipating the necessary actions. The latter, meanwhile, follows a fixed schedule to verify that assets are functioning properly and to take action as needed.

However, these two types of maintenance have one thing in common: they require a minimum of human and technical intervention—only when it is truly necessary.

 

The Benefits of Predictive Maintenance in Industry

Beyond its differences from preventive maintenance, predictive maintenance offers numerous advantages from a practical, technical, organizational, and even financial standpoint.

On the one hand, it allows for the precise targeting of maintenance interventions to maximize their effectiveness and thereby extend the service life of equipment. These operations are therefore performed only when absolutely necessary, based on the condition, performance, and degree of wear of the components. The result is a reduction in maintenance costs and downtime, as well as the optimization of production and the availability of human and material resources.

Furthermore, predictive maintenance enhances operational safety by preventing serious breakdowns. Such breakdowns can pose a real danger to workers, in addition to damaging infrastructure.

 

How Can Predictive Maintenance Be Implemented in Industry?

Predictive Maintenance in Principle

Predictive maintenance makes continuous data collection essential. To this end, equipment performance metrics (vibrations, temperature, pressure, etc.) are monitored and analyzed in real time. This continuous monitoring relies in particular on machine learning and artificial intelligence algorithms.

Once collected, this data must also be analyzed with a high degree of precision. In this context, it is crucial to incorporate the use of computer-aided maintenance management software (CMMS) into your processes.

 

The TopSolid Suite of CAD, CAM, PDM, and ERP Solutions

What are the main tools used in predictive maintenance?

Predictive maintenance relies on a number of tools and technologies for data collection. These include:

  • connected devices (IoT), such as sensors, which collect information from equipment in real time,
  • predictive algorithms (machine learning), which analyze data to detect anomalies and predict failures,
  • big data collection and analysis platforms, which manage and process large volumes of data to provide you with relevant and actionable insights for your maintenance strategy and operations,
  • CMMS software, such as the solutions offered by TOPSOLID, which facilitate the collection, management, and analysis of maintenance data.

With so many solutions available, ease of use and user experience are two key criteria for choosing the best solution. The goal is to have an advanced interface at your fingertips that provides your maintenance teams with clear visibility and the ability to make effective use of the data.

Key Steps for Successfully Implementing Predictive Maintenance

Once the tools for implementing predictive maintenance have been deployed, four steps are essential:

  1. Identifying anomalies (either internally or through algorithms) and implementing corrective actions;
  2. The development of predictive models (creation and training) based on historical data;
  3. Adjusting your maintenance processes by incorporating these predictive models;
  4. Performance monitoring and continuous adaptation.

This pattern repeats itself endlessly. It’s a virtuous cycle that ensures your predictive maintenance process is always up-to-date, efficient, and tailored to the realities of your environment at any given moment.

TopSolid’Erp for Effective Implementation of Predictive Maintenance

Recognized as the most advanced ERP solution for production management, quality control, and traceability, TopSolid’Erp includes a CMMS module. It was designed to make it easier to monitor the condition of your equipment, ensuring the optimal use of all your assets.

Among its key features are the scheduling of preventive maintenance and the reporting of corrective maintenance. This enhanced ability to plan ahead, combined with close monitoring, allows you to optimize the productivity of your production lines under all circumstances.

When properly implemented, predictive maintenance represents a major step forward for companies. Adopting this practice is tantamount to entering Industry 4.0—a data-driven industry that relies heavily on the capabilities of artificial intelligence.

By leveraging advanced technologies and integrated software—just like TOPSOLID does—you’ll be able to anticipate breakdowns and plan effective maintenance. This will help ensure an increasingly smooth and secure production process. Ready to get started? Contact us!

Métallerie Serrurerie Kopko: the customized parts expert who trust TopSolid’Steel

Métallerie Serrurerie Kopko: the customized parts expert who trust TopSolid’Steel

Founded in 2017 in Reims, Métallerie Serrurerie Kopko, also known as MSK, deploys its know-how and expertise in creating custom metal structures. Glass roofs, staircases, gates, metal doors and joinery, made-to-measure furniture, glass floors, and ceilings… MSK aims to enhance various spaces with distinctive elements, whether it’s an entrance hall, walkway, or contemporary furniture. From feasibility studies to 3D design and manufacturing, MSK relies on TopSolid’Steel to comprehensively fulfill its customers’ requirements. Let’s focus on this successful collaboration.

Métallerie serrurerie Kopko: exceptional craftsmanship in fine metalwork

Specializing in designing and manufacturing complex metal structures, MSK provides aesthetic and customized solutions. MSK’s core principle is to fully align with the desires of its professional and private customers, bringing their projects to life exactly as envisioned. While the company’s main products are interior and exterior glass and steel joinery, it also creates a wide range of staircases and ornamental metalwork. Passion, attention to detail, and the pursuit of perfection guide every stage of work in the workshop, where teams combine traditional craftsmanship with contemporary techniques.

Métallerie Serrurerie Kopko’s work covers the full range of metalwork. This includes ironwork for architectural embellishments like railings, grilles, art pieces, and design objects as well as locksmithing for various locking devices.

These different specialties enables the company to work on metal joinery and complex structures, often combining metal with other materials such as glass. Whether it is steel, bronze, brass, stainless steel, or other materials, MSK has developed proficiency in working with a wide range of materials, with an infinite variety of textures, patinas, and finishes, to meet our customers’ every need.

The range of CAD, CAM, ERP and PDM TopSolid solutions

Today, the company has 6 employees. MSK’s customers are 60% private individuals and 40% professionals. Often accompanied by interior designers, private customers seek unique pieces to enhance their interiors. At the same time, businesses see MSK’s work as a powerful communication tool to differentiate their offices or high-traffic areas. “Regarding professional customers, we have champagne houses and stores like Ikea and Vinci. We’ve also worked on projects abroad, notably in Barcelona and Tokyo, where we produced lanterns for a restaurant”, explains Kévin Kopko, 30 y.o., founder of MSK.

The only limit to MSK’s projects is their clients’ imagination. To answers to this wide variety of projects, MSK needed CAD software that would allow them to bring any project to life. That’s why Métallerie Serrurerie Kopko adopted TopSolid’Steel in November 2020.

How does MSK saves time with TopSolid’Steel?

“I chose TopSolid because I know that it offers limitless possibilities to create anything you want with this software” says the MSK manager. He designs staircases, skylights, glass floors, and other custom projects using the software. What does Kévin Kopko like best?

The time saved, thanks to TopSolid’Steel. He particularly likes the component library and its wide range of profiles: Jansen, for example, or everything about screws from Würth.

TopSolid’Steel has plenty of useful features: “When we design our staircases, we use family components. “We’ve created several types of steps: wood, metal, and glass. We just have to import them when we design our staircases, and they are automatically parameterized during the design phase” explains Kévin Kopko.

TopSolid’Steel’s unrivaled CAD software also provided MSK’s customers with an unmatched level of  immersion. They can enjoy realistic renderings and the ability to place 3D structures in photos. Kévin Kopko emphasizes: “The Realistic 3D rendering in TopSolid has already enabled us to close deals! This feature simplifies the presentation of projects to customers, making it much more intuitive and user-friendly”.

 

MSK and TopSolid: a continued and successful partnership

Kevin Kopko first attended a TOPSOLID training session to learn how to use the software. Then a TOPSOLID technician spent 2 days at the MSK premises. During this methodological training, he offered practical solutions to address the problems encountered by the users.

 

After 2 years using TopSolid Steel, MSK is still very satisfied. “With TopSolid’Steel, I can design a part more quickly” says Kevin Kopko. “Moreover, TopSolid’Steel is fun to use, and facilitates communication with subcontractors, such as laserists. I’m particularly satisfied with Arthur’s great availability, the TOPSOLID sales representative for our sector”.

Métallerie Serrurerie Kopko also values the availability of the hotline. The teams know that if an issue arise, they can promptly reach a qualified person on the phone and get assistance.

In the future, MSK intends to invest in new premises to accommodate the installation of new laser-cutting machines, which could be operated using TopSolid modules.

Everything you need to know about programming complex parts

Everything you need to know about programming complex parts

In CAD/CAM, and particularly in machining, the manufacturing of parts with complex shapes must comply with the functional specifications expressed by the designer or the creator. The geometric model built in CAD is a digital reference model that must be reproduced as accurately as possible during the manufacturing phase. Complex shapes can sometimes be difficult to reproduce: adequate programming is therefore the key to success in CAD/CAM.

What is a complex part?

We speak of a complex part when there are topologies that must go through many machining paths, often with risk of collision, as well as areas that are difficult to access. The notion of the complexity of a part does not only depend on its shape or its size. In fact, the nature of the material used, the presence of residual stresses, the risk of overheating or the precision that is required are all factors that contribute to complicating the task for the machine tool operators.

 

Examples of complex parts

  • Aluminum moulds for plastic injection;
  • Automobile cylinder heads;
  • Inconel turbine blades for aeronautics;
  • Titanium bearings for the aerospace industry.

 

TopSolid CAD/CAM Product Range

Steps for successful programming

Before proceeding to the manufacturing stage, it is essential to be well prepared. The CAD file of the part to be designed must first be checked and the tolerances adjusted. It is obviously necessary to choose the machine and tools adapted to the expected result and, if possible, to go through a simulation stage. 

 

Preliminary analysis

Before starting the manufacturing stage, all parts must be checked. First, make sure that it is the correct part and the correct version of the file. 

 

Tolerance management

For a complex CAD model to be machinable, it often requires modification. In fact, in most situations, CAD models are drawn from nominal dimensions. However, manufacturing and machining operations impose tolerances that will need to be adjusted in the CAD files. If you are using a CAD/CAM software, think about its ability to modify the dimensions afterward.  

 

Choosing machines and cutting tools

Not all machines are created equal. Choosing the right machine depends on many parameters such as the shape of the part, the size, the material, etc. Likewise, there is a multitude of cutting tools dedicated to machining complex parts. Their shape depends on the geometries to be drilled, turned or milled, and the material they are made of is selected according to the material to be machined as well as the kinematic parameters. The choice of machines and tools will therefore strongly determine the success of the machining process.  

 

Go through a simulation step before starting the manufacturing

Machining complex parts is expensive, so it is best to avoid messing up the first parts and having to perform machining operations again. Therefore, simulating the tool paths in parallel with the programming allows the operator to compare the simulated model with the machining in progress, which prevents the risk of collision and enables real-time reaction.

 

Advantages of TopSolid

One of the challenges of CAD/CAM is producing complex parts using the minimum number of steps, the ideal is to be able to independently machine a part, without disassembly. TopSolid’Cam is therefore able to manage the programming of lathes/milling machines, whether turning combined with 2D or 3D milling operations as well as 4-axis or 5-axis continuous.  

 

Managing the latest tools

TopSolid’Cam is able to manage the new barrel milling cutters. These milling cutters are best able to adapt to the shapes with low curvature, which makes it possible to significantly reduce the number of passes in the 5-axis tool path.  

 

Dynamic machining in turning and milling

TopSolid’Cam integrates a high-performance machining function, which makes it possible to keep a constant volume of material removed during the machining process and therefore to wear out the cutting tools less quickly.  

Easy to modify afterward

The TopSolid software, and in particular the version dedicated to TopSolid’Cam machining, is extremely flexible as it offers powerful features that allow you to modify the parts afterward. This is an asset for the manufacturing of complex parts, which require many adjustments.  

 

Automatic shape detection

TopSolid can automatically detect basic shapes such as grooves, drillings and pockets on models designed with TopSolid, but also on imported models. This makes the software a valuable ally that helps to guide the operator to the right machining strategies through intelligent topological analysis.  

 

Powerful algorithms

The programming of complex 4-axis and 5-axis parts requires high-performance simulation tools and powerful automation. TopSolid’Cam incorporates valuable automatic features such as collision detection, which helps to reduce machining defects. Thanks to all the machining algorithms offered by TopSolid, it is possible to process all the parts of a mould, for example.